It is necessary to mention that in an act in which one must be aware of oneself and of others, the manifestation of art is necessary, but not just any, but rather one that allows one to recognize the thoughts of those who make up society based on what it concerns me. It is not precisely a type of social acceptance, but rather an anticipation of what the being intends with others. Because we are individuals gifted enough to recognize that we have as many mistakes as virtues, and that an interpretation of them is necessary to manage them. Because the human is not the one who is blameless, but on the contrary is the one who recognizes their mistakes and is in charge of remedying them in such a way that they become virtues. But the human is also not that virtuous and irremediable,It is someone who is capable of handling such neatness with simplicity, without any privilege for being it, but who are at the service of the being and the community.
The individual is not the one who only thinks about himself, but has so much awareness about it that allows him to recognize the thoughts of others, the so-called "class consciousness" which differs from the science (s) precisely because the second is the knowledge of being integrated into science, knowing, which has the fundamental capacity to recognize this class. Those gifts or virtues assigned either by nature or by genes, are what allow the imprisoned soul to unfold in a worldly body, which precisely distances us each time from these virtues, because the body has been in charge of damaging that of others., and together with them the soul.
This is why art comes to life based on the integration of each individual, because sporadically we recognize our existence and therefore that of others, but it is not enough. Although art is beautiful, beautiful, skillful and happy in itself, the art of living involves more than sporadic situations. This is because it is about understanding the functions and the pleasure of life, which torments many and others causes orgasms, so living it does not sound so far-fetched despite the limitations of the same mind compared to the development of the being.
But if art and life are very complex, imagine the art of living, how complicated it is! However, it's not that difficult after all, it's just about… living? That's right, something redundant and that is what has mainly been forgotten throughout the "evolution" of societies. But why? If it is so inherent in freedom… One moment… Now it all makes sense. Yes, yes, it does because the one who is free lives, the one who lives is free. So why are we enslaved even by our own desires? Is it funny enough to say or think if you are a slave to what it is to be a slave to want to get ahead? From a nice house? Of a good car? Everyone longs for this, but is that being free? That is living? But young man, if you don't want to get ahead you won't live!Who says that getting ahead is inherent in life? Those worry so much about getting ahead that they forget to exist, they forget that it is not about being subjugated, during the years of their lives they think that they have been free, that they have lived, when they really forgot about these virtues so the The world has offered them throughout their lives, because the art of living is inherent in freedom, so why are we not free if we "live"? It is because you don't really live, you never lived and after death you won't be able to live anymore.Because the art of living is inherent in freedom, so why are we not free if we "live"? It is because you don't really live, you never lived and after death you won't be able to live anymore.Because the art of living is inherent in freedom, so why are we not free if we "live"? It is because you don't really live, you never lived and after death you won't be able to live anymore.
Therefore it is necessary to begin to develop the objective of our creation, what was already called redundant paragraphs ago, but which is necessary for our very existence, life! However, this does not mean that it is easy and it never will be, because the nature of human origin is not and will never be the ease of existing or of obtaining the means for it, but rather it is the most complex game in which must be done carefully so as not to lose the only life that is in it. So the philosophy of life of people must consist of developing each of the capacities that nature itself in its difficulty has given individuals to subsist within it, and this is not just a walk that you are going to enjoy., but the one for which you must fight to enjoy it.
It is at this point in life that self-government, authority over oneself, which allows the growth of each individual and their free development, must be highlighted not hierarchically but with solvency. Although it is true that the manifestations of authority produce a hierarchy in society, regarding the relationships of the individuals that make it up, the one that the self manifests itself gives itself thousands of possibilities that allow us to clarify the role of each one in the social organization In which it is found. For this reason its good use has been distorted and instead of giving it its usefulness, they have submerged such concept to that of government, to that of the State in political organizations, which ultimately distances authority over one's own being to give way to a minority that be the one to take care of it,since the minds of individuals have been weakened in such a way that the difficulty with which nature conceived us is not praised, but is evaded so that the most important power of individuals is given to a supposed organization that aims to his well-being, when he is in charge of doing the opposite.
This government that has a figure of supposed freedom, who arrives like a leader shouting left and right, I will give you freedom, follow me! In contrast to virtuous self-government, the other in the form of authority has been in charge of appointing tasks to what he calls his "governed", so precisely its role is pejoratively assigned, which is to centralize power in a minority that directs the wishes of their governed. Although the ruler can say that he acts according to the intentions of those who assign him that power, but nevertheless individuals by nature cannot maintain greater power over their own, because it is not our instinct. Even so, they have deliberately been in charge of assigning, through the beautiful democracy, but in its lowest conception (which is the representative one), to a single individual representing the whole group, what is of the people is not for one,but for the people. But this is not the dictatorship of the proletariat, but through individual participation, that authority is returned to being, to itself and to its own government, the one that allows the development of all human faculties.
Still, history has borne witness that the same individuals with their mean behavior have failed to demonstrate their own governability, therefore their freedom. So to ease the issue regarding this lack of self-knowledge, it was decided by consensus that one of the individuals belonging to a society would rule and speak for everyone, because each one did not have the sufficient capacity to govern their behavior and decided to leave that power to another.. Doesn't it sound stupid even to say that they decided by themselves and in a consensual way to leave their decision-making capacity to someone else? What logic! However, this is what has happened, which resulted in the decline of morals, ethics, self-knowledge and self-government,between multiple virtues that are characteristic of human beings. Without knowing it, the same society, with said decision, has assumed the will of all the individuals that make up a civilization.
In contrast, a series of groups of individuals have emerged that on their own account have managed to demonstrate based on their conduct, the same that has been petty and conducive to giving functionality to the government, who do not need it or the laws that have invented to give permanence to their "organization" so that they are a kind of countercurrent which is simply made up of individuals who have been in charge of thinking, of seeking true freedom. Because it is this same State that has sold a false liberation, pretending to establish a regime which alienates those belonging to the society that governs freedom, from what it implies together with its difficulty in exercising it.
These individuals, knowing the perverse intentions of those rulers, have dedicated their lives to recognizing each one of the determining factors of its remaining in the place it is in and substantially eradicating all its functionality based on decent behavior, enough to to annul its power, that which belongs to each of us who make up a society and was voluntarily expropriated. This was precisely given by one of the functions of the State in its desire to remain in charge, which is in charge of misrepresenting reality so that individuals consider the freedom they claim to propose as real and true, which however, as mentioned, is in against it not for recognizing its limits, because it is inherent to its complete exercise,but because what he proposes is slavery instead of freedom. It is a complex matter, because despite the fact that there are beings who recovered their power, their own government, the State as another of its functions has led to the eradication of all those who indicate that they are against their stay in society. Because if it has remained it is because of the will of a people that is not capable of governing itself, but this does not imply that some of its members have not recognized this virtue as essential when it comes to achieving liberation.Because if it has remained it is because of the will of a people that is not capable of governing itself, but this does not imply that some of its members have not recognized this virtue as essential when it comes to achieving liberation.Because if it has remained it is because of the will of a people that is not capable of governing itself, but this does not imply that some of its members have not recognized this virtue as essential when it comes to achieving liberation.
So this is a sample of human nature, not the one that simply demeans it to evil, but the one that is in a constant search for freedom and the integration of the entire society for its optimal development, all in function of the principle that has allowed the breed to evolve, mutual support.
Historically the fight for existence has been a theory of why human beings have reached the evolution that is understood today, however it is not consistent given our cognitive characteristics that are what have created the gap between animals and beings. humans. Although it is true that all living beings, at least animals, have important cognitive traits that developed in the same way that they have evolved, humans have also achieved this in a multivariate and even exponential way.
But this cognitive growth is not only due to the environment, but also to the motivation of the individuals belonging to the species to increase the capacities already described by the fact that they have allowed us to survive despite the large number of adversities that could easily have been eradicated to the species totally, however, for example, brain growth allowed skills to be developed with greater accuracy, such as language, which precisely became a human need to survive, this to determine the link it needed with their counterpart, as long as they managed to establish a communication, rooted their objectives more in order to achieve them with greater security.
Not only in this aspect, language became a necessity, but also for the fact of maintaining a psychological force regarding this dimension of the human being, because precisely knowing others and their thoughts through verbal communication fosters self-knowledge and what shapes the other's thinking.
Es en este contexto en el cual se desarrolla una interrelación entre individuo-sociedad y a su vez individuo-especie, en la cual se posee un equilibrio constante que es lo que permite desarrollar todo aspecto biológico e interpersonal. El primero referencia la política que es utilizada para organizar la sociedad y de cómo ésta se ha de vincular a cada individuo, generando una proporción por la cual se mantiene la estabilidad emocional, interpersonal, racional, entre las distintas dimensiones que conforman a cada ser humano. El segundo precisamente comprende la función del ambiente, tanto social como ecológico, sobre el desarrollo físico, emocional, psicológico, intelectual y de todos modos cerebral que es el que nos caracteriza, para que se genere un vínculo simbiótico funcional, es decir que subsistan por y para ellas mismas generando a su vez una homeostásis en los niveles ya mencionados.
In these terms, the objective of existence can be defined, and for this reason, self-government as a tool to achieve it, the happiness that each individual desires, in their own conceptions of what they need to achieve it, and therefore further away from what they really it is. When this occurs precisely, a bilaterality is usually generated in each interrelation, for example, inclined towards the individual who disregards society and even the species, generating a deviation of interests, both individual and collective, which gradually unbalances society and even the individual.
The aforementioned at the end of the paragraph would correspond to a long series of social issues that have shaped the establishment of violence as a means of obtaining any end, with a facade of freedom that is completely false precisely because by leaving aside the society that conceived to the individual and submitting it to their interests creates a conditioned conception of freedom, which in effect does not correspond to what our species works for the world, and society as a creation of the species in which it has also caused excesses that affect the civilian population.
However, to appeal to happiness, which should be for each one, it is necessary to think about what the other conceives as being happy together with what he conceives of himself, given this as a turning point in which he deviates from the path suitable. It is not a matter of understanding happiness in the same way, but of recognizing the misunderstanding that is generated by not allowing the happiness of others because of simply leaving aside the repercussions that own decisions generate in others, weakening the individual character and in that same collective way.
Under these conditions it is evident the involution of the human species given by its ambitions and among other aspects that have deteriorated the development of humans, so it is necessary to mention the role that mutual support has had on the evolution of human beings in Both by means of a free pact, a cognitive and technological, scientific, intellectual and artistic advance will be developed, among other human facets which, under another medium, could not have been presented.
So for this reason mutual support is understood as an evolutionary factor, which must be specified in the organization of a society as a determining pillar in the cognitive and social development of the same since providing help to the other has generated ties of trust, fraternity and reciprocity. Without this factor as a means in the evolutionary process, it will be more complicated, so the population will be stagnant precisely because of dispensing with a medium that has been useful, both in social and cognitive growth, even at a scientific and technological level, among others..
Its usefulness lies precisely in the measure that a society or commune enters into a pact with another with the purpose of developing and obtaining what they do not possess and need and also offer others what is produced and what they do not have. In this sense, the principle of reciprocity that claims freedom as a right and as a duty is understood so that if it is vigorously applied, the population will grow at the levels already mentioned.
So applied the pillar of mutual support in society, it is necessary to say that in addition to being a means it is also an end so that in both situations self-government is a tool that precisely allows each individual to glimpse a reality not only individual but collective, which develops trust together with fraternity. So in this sense, self-government also becomes a means and an end, not only useful but essential for obtaining freedom, equality and equity.
Download the original file
