Goals:
- Define and structure the conception of work with key actors, as elements of articulation of society and strengthening of social cohesion Establish the concordance between individual - society - organization - territory as an element of analysis for the planning of land use Present models, instruments, tools for capturing, analyzing and prospecting the territory based on the multisectoral and multidimensional articulation of the territory Present the Mapping of Key Actors as the instrument for interpreting the relationships of the individual - society - organization with its territory, level of impact and reliability.
Origin of Key Actor Mapping (MAC)
- There are several types of methodological instruments that allow the collection of information on the number of actors that exist in a given geographical area. The mapping of actors has been part of the traditional instruments of sociologists, anthropologists, social workers and promoters to obtain information from the dynamics of the actors in a territory and among them. Its origin can be traced back to participatory planning models developed in the United States in the 1960s, its conception was basically social and limited to the conception of the identification "of whom we are going or I'm going to work. ”It is a fact that until a few years ago, mapping instruments had been a secondary and tertiary element in the processes of understanding territorial dynamics in its multidimensional conception.It is evident that conceptually and operationally the Mapping of Key Actors has not been potentiated. All change at the beginning of this century (XXI), when when introducing the approach of “multidimensionality” of the territory it was necessary to understand the “true social and human capital” that interacts in a certain territory. When a new methodological approach arises in the context of the "School of Evolutionary Organic Planning" (EPOE) In the context of the EPOE, the MAC is revalued as it is considered as the PLATFORM of territorial planning, in particular to achieve consensus processes or social transactions between actors in the same sector.when when introducing the approach of "multidimensionality" of the territory it was necessary to understand the "true social and human capital" that interacts in a given territory. When a new methodological approach arises in the context of the "School of Evolutionary Organic Planning" (EPOE) In the context of the EPOE, the MAC is revalued as it is considered as the PLATFORM of territorial planning, in particular to achieve consensus processes or social transactions between actors in the same sector.when when introducing the approach of "multidimensionality" of the territory it was necessary to understand the "true social and human capital" that interacts in a given territory. When a new methodological approach arises in the context of the "School of Evolutionary Organic Planning" (EPOE) In the context of the EPOE, the MAC is revalued as it is considered as the PLATFORM of territorial planning, in particular to achieve consensus processes or social transactions between actors in the same sector.the MAC is revalued as it is considered as the PLATFORM of territorial planning, in particular to achieve consensus processes or social transactions between actors in the same sector.the MAC is revalued as it is considered as the PLATFORM of territorial planning, in particular to achieve consensus processes or social transactions between actors in the same sector.
(See PDF)
