One of the great concerns I had as a researcher was to be able to specify in a coherent way a definition of disease that would endorse within the scientific and universal conceptualization, avoiding sticking to the parameters of the WHO and the UN consensus, because I have never felt satisfied with the definitions established within their protocols and imposed as dogma to professional training academies within their health programs.
Although autoimmune, genetic or idiopathic concepts have led medicine to a dead end, leaving the programmed health professional in the uncertainty of not knowing what to expect due to the lack of an objective scientific literature, but simply limiting himself to protocols established as straitjackets by those who have handled scientific literature at will.
In one of my publications, I gave a definition like this: "Disease is a physicochemical process with thermodynamic effects that is characterized by an alteration of the homeostatic balance. " We define homeostasis as the property of living organisms that consists of their ability to maintain stable internal conditions, compensating for changes in their environment through the regulated exchange of matter and energy with the outside (metabolism).
It is a form of dynamic stationary state that is made possible by a network of feedback control systems that constitute the self-regulation mechanisms of living beings. Examples of homeostasis are the regulation of temperature and the balance between acidity and alkalinity (PH). So we can state that the disease is reflected in these two conditions.
Take as an example an outdated definition of disease: when it was defined as the body's response to a pathogenic germ, in this case it is interpreted that it is not the pathogenic germ that is responsible for the disease, but rather the physicochemical conditions of the internal environment (terrain: extracellular fluids) those that allow the entry of pathogenic germs, that is, the pathogenic germ is a consequence and not the cause of the disease.
What are the causes of the disease?
We can answer that the disease is due to two main causes:
- having violated the laws of nature A market strategy.
The laws of nature are laws recognized by universal naturism, as doctrinal heritage in the declaration of principles issued by the III Latin American Congress of Naturism held in Santiago de Chile in April 1976 and are:
- Breathing clean air Eating healthy plant foods Being sober constantly Drinking natural water Being clean in everything Mastering the passions, seeking the greatest chastity Loving work and avoiding idleness Rest and sleep only as much as necessary Dress simply and with slack. Cultivate virtues, trying to be happy and serene.
The second cause of the disease is a quite controversial point because who is in charge of the protocols and bishop sanctity to baptize the "diseases" the CDC, that is, the Center for "Control" and Diagnoses of Diseases of Atlanta (USA).
According to analysis, what the CDC has done is baptize a number of symptoms as causes, that is, they have classified a series of symptoms as pathologies, only with the purpose of diversifying the indiscriminate use of chemical molecules to alleviate symptoms and not solve the origin of the problem to maintain chronicity and create drug dependence in their clients.
This is one of the causes or motives that degraded the condition of patients to users and from users to addicted clients and dependent on palliative chemical molecules and therefore has led medicine and physicians (now programmed) to turn them into street vendors of the pharmaceutical chemical poster distorting the true objective of pharmacology as an auxiliary science of medicine in the recovery of the patient and contributing
to deteriorate the image and professional practice of the doctor.
