Strategic alliance between workers and the state.
Excessive pursuit of personal gain associated with the subculture of corruption.
Transformation of public management = technical, economic, political and ethical knowledge.
Study of the transition of power and paradigmatic changes of the leadership.
Sociology of management = management of theories, methods and procedures. For our country the MECI.
In addition to the administration of material resources, it involves and includes the study of human work, labor relations and the impact of companies on the environment.
The discipline of managerial sociology, seeks an approach to work as a natural activity of man giving importance to the investigation of the values of sociability such as understanding, consensus and motivation.
Humanization of work; the sociology of management goes more towards substituting the alienating character of managerial instrumentalism. Today manual work is separated from intellectual work when integrative leadership was to be sought.
In this sense, the development of a sociological thought that takes on significant relevance in a context where, increasingly, the technocratic approach collapses before the critical situation of most of the countries that applied it in an orthodox way and before the tacit recognition of its difficulties for the socioeconomic development of the countries in terms of relevance, equity and social justice.
Sociological thinking in management has been mediated by some barriers that deserve to be highlighted:- The atomization of the public administration The technocratic tendencies The little capacity to lead the changes.
Faced with this reality, as a field of fully defined knowledge and practices, the sociology of management would have to become an instrument to promote profound change in the management of the administration and to contribute to the governance of the public.
“Economic development with a human face” (Kliksberg, 2004).
Managerial fashion different from Quality of life.
- Social commitment. The scientific-technical domain claims of systematic managerial sociology sociological preparation of managerial cadres, as it is about the revaluation of public management.
This includes the technical training and the formation in values of the leaders, since it is hoped that they acquire adequate social responsibility, in order to stimulate citizen power in the self-management of social processes.
Sociology as a discipline can serve to understand the spiritual dimension of productive activity in any area of society.
It is mainly related to three basic guidelines, namely:
- Political development for the participation of the collective within the framework of the local and global transformation process Social and community promotion to strengthen the ties of grassroots organizations with the state Executive organization to efficiently direct companies and the participation of Workers.
It is necessary to note that his objective goes beyond the study of economic benefits and the rise in the social structure by the elite. For this reason, the sociological perspective should consider among its strategic objectives:
- Improve the quality of the results of public management Incorporate a critical exercise of management technologies that wave around the world Maintain an indigenous management model Prepare and train citizens for local and endogenous development Accelerate the creation of new situations of justice and solidarity in the always complex circumstances of globalization.
Sociological research should have as its horizon a new conception of management with dialectical principles such as: diversity, co-responsibility and integration. Such principles are oriented towards the sensitivity, trust and flexibility of the company's executive staff, in order to convert technical-administrative management into knowledge of the public domain.
The guidelines, objectives and principles, briefly outlined here, frame a new conception of participatory management from which it is possible to break with the hegemony that certain elites who control management positions usually impose in the public sector with a pragmatic and exclusive exercise (POLITIQUERY). The sociological perspective tries to investigate the way in which the techno-bureaucracy (Poulantzas, 1970) becomes the dominant stratum, where the different managerial elites converge to manage the resources of the economy and subordinate the public apparatus to monopoly plans. Similarly for Poulantzas, in the classical Marxist reflection, bureaucracy is a specifically political phenomenon and designates a category referred to the State apparatus;It is for this reason that bureaucratism (Understood as ????) is due both to the structures of the capitalist state, and to the effect of capitalist ideology on the normative rules that organize the aforementioned apparatus.
For Poulantzas, authoritarian statism is characterized by the domination of the upper administration and the intensification of the executive's political control over it.
Actually, Weber focuses on the rationality of human action, as an Ideal model.
From the above, it could be inferred that managerial action in the Marxist field would be oriented to analyze and apprehend the relationships between the forces that generate social conflict in a process of conceptual reproduction of the real.
Bibliography
Unit VI Marxism at the end of the XIX century until the 1960s XX century. Public administrative thinking ESAP 2008.
