The processes of change and modernization that are carried out in the countries are taking place with increasing acceleration, in such a way that the frequency of their transformation decreases over the years, the policy of modernizing via internationalization constitutes a kind of process of continuous transformation, and basically for this work we define it as the use of a context projected, tested, experienced and accepted by the actors of the society developed and implemented in other societies, through what we will call the adoption process. We must previously prepare an orderly, logical, predictable country design and have a leadership level according to the circumstance, where the rules of the game are clear and even, establishing simple policies,appropriate and adequate to a reality that is dynamic therefore when we say, appropriate, adequate and simple, we mean that they adapt quickly to the changes that take place permanently and at the same time do not distort the concepts of the intended country model.-
Based on the aforementioned, this process should expand rapidly, and more so in an economy eager to recover an incipient commercial, cultural, political and social development. But on the other hand, there are many variables that we have considered that should work together so that this process is healthy and appropriate, consequently proposing to find the central axis of the problem and promote the elements of judgment in this regard.-
2. Previous considerations
To adopt the policies of modernizing through internationalization, the adoption process that we are going to develop is based on a set of countries grouped according to general similarities on political and economic mechanisms and processes, with territorial proximity, which that makes the reality of each one of them consubstantiate with that of the other members, while noting the autonomy over customs and identities that each of the members have rooted in their residents. By way of evaluation and taking the adoption process as convergent, we will consider the developing countries of Latin America and those of Eastern Europe.
3. General framework
The integration of international markets and the accentuation of the globalization process as a whole, in a world stage dominated by developed countries, is the starting point or the scheme that these two sets of countries must accept if they want to apply the policy. To modernize via internationalization, when countries do not have the appropriate framework to enter this process, it becomes directed, satisfying the needs of a specific segment of these societies and not precisely this segment corresponds to the vast majority of its members, but rather on the contrary, it bets on a minority generally disconnected from the reality of the rest, which makes the process not equitable. Even more so if we take into account that the policy implemented by modernization providers,that in defense of their legitimate interests and prioritizing their benefits, increasingly marginalize access to modernization in a balanced way, and equal opportunities, supported in many cases by governments that tend to use regulations in such broad ways that practically adapt them to the circumstances of the day in a very creative way.-
4. The price for the elapsed time
The shortest way for the countries of Eastern Europe is to look to the West and try to adopt an existing political, economic and cultural organization, combining imitation with international integration, which in more pragmatic terms than what is mentioned above, let's say that what is required is liberal democracy, consumer culture and capitalism. As a starting point, the first thing would be to reconcile the will of modernizers and modernizers in the sense that both have the desire and the convenience of applying the same policy, otherwise if either party understands that it is not favored to some extent, their Interest falls, that is, it is a commitment with mutual benefits and obligations. The reality of the European Union for integration with the rest of the European countries,indicates that for the moment their economies work very well and that there are no immediate urgencies for making transcendent decisions, it is like the interpretation of time is carried out in a vertical sense, where most of its members are in an enviable splendor and its inhabitants in very favorable conditions to perform on a personal level developing activities for which they have been prepared, but this sense of the interpretation of time in the vertical sense does not take into account that the countries of Eastern Europe need other times, precisely We refer to considering the unit of time in a horizontal sense, where emergencies are daily and the solutions to these problems cannot be delayed,Among other issues, it is to be considered that so many years cannot pass to unify the eastern and western sectors of the continent because if the idea of belonging to a society with greater well-being becomes lethargic, it becomes an unattainable longing and even ends up losing some interest. We can almost say that this is the real problem to take into account, the time that has elapsed and that will continue to elapse is the central point of the issue in which the greatest possible emphasis should be placed, logically that both within the European Union, As from the countries of Eastern Europe, each one has opinions for and against and surely those opinions have valid reasons.it becomes an unattainable longing and even ends up losing some interest. We can almost say that this is the real problem to take into account, the time that has elapsed and that will continue to elapse is the central point of the issue in which the greatest possible emphasis should be placed, logically that both within the European Union, As from the countries of Eastern Europe, each one has opinions for and against and surely those opinions have valid reasons.it becomes an unattainable longing and even ends up losing some interest. We can almost say that this is the real problem to take into account, the time that has elapsed and that will continue to elapse is the central point of the issue in which the greatest possible emphasis should be placed, logically that both within the European Union, As from the countries of Eastern Europe, each one has opinions for and against and surely those opinions have valid reasons.As from the countries of Eastern Europe, each one has opinions for and against and surely those opinions have valid reasons.As from the countries of Eastern Europe, each one has opinions for and against and surely those opinions have valid reasons.
For the Western European countries, the objective will continue to be to accentuate the developed capitalism model. This recent implementation of the monetary unit is one more sign that their concerns go through deepening it on the basis that their inhabitants are perfectly covered with the charm that it provides, therefore the decisions are from there, it is like a protective umbrella where the concerns of its leaders are above it since below this there is not much to worry about because the social apparatus that they have considers absolutely all the unpredictabilities of society.
In the case of Eastern Europe, it should be noted that there are several factors that influenced the initiation of the stage considered as the evolution of the transformation process, the starting point is the disintegration of the alternative model to capitalism, added to the characteristics regarding the qualities presented by the leading leaders of the developed countries of Western Europe in the eighties, plus the rise of multinational industries that no longer consider territorial borders as a limit to their growth, the impressive development in the field of technology and hence the deepening of the globalization process,were those that, together with other factors of less relevance, led skeptics and opponents to try to agree on their incorporation into the model of developed capitalism in Western Europe, which, if carried out, on the one hand is a lot of time that has been wasted, let us consider that these countries have left the previous process behind for more than ten years and need a defined alternative, and on the other, as we mentioned in the previous paragraph, their future trading partners are not willing to openly give up the benefits they achieved after the last thirty years.and on the other hand, as we mentioned in the previous paragraph, its future commercial partners are not willing to openly give up the benefits they have achieved after the last thirty years.and on the other hand, as we mentioned in the previous paragraph, its future commercial partners are not willing to openly give up the benefits they have achieved after the last thirty years.
5. Latin America: The previous transformation
The case of the developing countries of Latin America is substantially different from that of Eastern Europe, in the first place because their economies promoted an extensive development over the use of technology, implying a waste of their resources, nestled in the lack of a defined economic model (agro-exporter, industrial, etc.) and sustained over time, with a high degree of corruption of the political leadership and permanently bureaucratized states. Allowing the entry and exit of capital, which, taking advantage of high interest rates and highly profitable short-term investment opportunities, caused profound social, political and economic crises practically continuously.
Almost as a constant the lags in their trade balances, the permanent fiscal hole based on an oversized public spending, the lack of adequate budgets, the concentration of power, the absence of a collection agency with the capacity to receive taxes and a system Increasingly regressive and vertical distribution, with accumulation of wealth at the top of the pyramid, have determined a very complicated situation, although the permanent pressures in favor of democracies and the mechanisms put into practice to eliminate corruption and the protection of human rights, ostensibly improved the situation, these were not enough,However, there is a very important factor to take into account and in turn differentiates the two proposed alternatives and consists in considering that while the Eastern European countries can join the European Union model, the developing countries of Latin America should open much more because the metric and welfare distances of the northern country are much more pronounced than in the European case. In this context, what must be understood is that what corresponds to apply are Approved Standards, that is, to apply tested and approved standards, that is, the application of the seal that confirms or verifies the performance of a certain action, at the same time recreating the initiatives individuals and generate the appropriate institutional framework, giving continuity to the rules of the game, with feasible objectives,mature and conscious.-
6. The accentuated effect of globalization
The organization of the demand has always been a big problem in all types of analysis, taking one of the many definitions of Globalization as a World Society without a world state and without a world government, society is losing collective consciousness and the capacity for political negotiation, we are remaining without a subject to solve problems that exceed territorial borders. The issue is much more complicated even if we consider that what is being affected is the division between politics and the economy, breaking this bipolarity and considering that everything must work as if it were a company in which the only important thing is the fulfillment of the economic objective. The fact is not new, what happens is that it is taking dimensions of a very high level of complexity to contain and control it.In developed countries, this empirically adopted modality means that the different cultural, economic and political forms are already intermingled, even with the difficulty of making it impossible to live apart from others. This group of countries is already fully internationalized in its modernity, and at the same time are at the forefront in the matter of modernization, therefore any type of modification quickly spreads among its partners to generally be located in a state superior to the previous one. The speed with which information is handled with super-technology media, the growth of multinational companies, the establishment of democracy as the ideal government model, international financial capital,Among other characteristics, they define globalization, or rather let's say that for globalizing countries, developed countries protect their most vulnerable products, restricting the full operation of free supply and demand in their markets.
To continue with the thesis of bipolarity we have to bear in mind that globalization also means global poverty, global marginalized, global destruction of world ecology, the reality of the countries that are below the line of developed countries and what we can say which are the globalized. The synergy produced by this model accentuates the movements or turbulences that are produced generating positive and negative consequences according to the economic potential of each country.-
In the field of finance, globalization reaches its climax, since it shows its true dimension, money moves quickly without restrictions, so that international financial crises have always gravitated with greater dimension in these countries that we are analyzing, and more Even in Latin America, any international financial crisis produces a gigantic expansive wave, which gravitates in adjustment and greater exclusion, always returning to the previous situation but
on a lower, cyclical and permanent scale.-
Attentive to the above and with a hint of optimism about the globalization process and leaving aside certain myths related to this, the model allows, on the one hand, to decide where one wants to go and also as the goodness of this system allows good relationships external companies maintain sustained development. With the premises of: thinking and programming in the long term, always bear in mind that the quality of the subordinate depends absolutely on the magnitude of the problem that affects him, knowing that economic power prevails in international relations and that the actions of Solidarity for the fight against social problems is like trying to cover the sky with our hands, we can consider globalization as an appropriate tool for internationalization policies.
7. Conclusions
In general terms, for the two groups of countries analyzed, the possibilities to produce any type of transformation and which in turn aims to raise the general welfare of a society always exists, in the specific case of using policies to modernize through internationalization., the adoption process should not escape from the initial approach in which we previously have to determine an orderly, logical and predictable framework, when we say orderly we understand that it must be done in a very methodical and detailed way doing the tasks with great neatness and responsibility, When we say logical we mean justice in the distribution, legitimacy in its leadership and indisputable participation of its institutions and when we say predictable, it is that in the short,medium and long term is predictable for the entire real circuit of the economy, families and companies must have the unavoidable certainty of the rules that will be respected.-
In particular terms, the Eastern European countries should try to speed up the times to join the Economic Community, the territorial proximity favors the process, demonstrating a positive attitude unifying the criteria of their leaders would be an important sign of the confidence that the model inspires. adopt. The reality of the Latin American countries indicates that it is necessary to go further, prepare the propitious framework solving basic and elementary social problems, define the economic model, and develop a vigorous foreign policy, which exceeds the territories of the countries as a whole, We rescue from this the Chilean case, which has given all the elementary conditions to accentuate the process of modernization via internationalization, and even more than this,the possibility of becoming a modernizer through the incorporation of cultural policies, products and spaces in the international arena as a provider agent.
Download the original file
