Logo en.artbmxmagazine.com

Companies recovered by workers in Argentina

Table of contents:

Anonim

Introduction:

In the Argentine Republic a very particular phenomenon is taking place: that of the factories recovered by the workers and put back into operation.

Many companies in Argentina were taken over by the workers and put into production, forming a real movement that begins to coordinate with other sectors in search of solutions to the problems that plague our country.

The decision to start producing came after a long maturation process for all the workers. Although at first it would seem that taking over a factory for ex-employees is an isolated and outlawed case, we must bear in mind that our country is experiencing a harsh crisis caused by the neoliberal model. This promoted policies in which financial-speculative investment prevailed to the detriment of productive investment. This fell dramatically and caused, by massive imports, a profound destruction of the national productive apparatus, increasing unemployment and poverty and indigence rates.

For years, this model produced, among other things, the constitution of monopolies, economic concentration, speculation, the non-strengthening of the national productive apparatus and the absence of policies that promote employment.

Because of this, the living conditions of the population decreased; and by the free trade measures, hundreds of factories closed their doors.

To better graph it, let's say that according to data from the Argentine Central of Workers based on INDEC in 2002, the richest tenth of the population earns 29 times more than the poorest tenth, which implies an increase in the income gap considering that in 1980 this gap was 12.7. The Household Survey, in 2002, places the unemployment rate at 21.5%, an underemployment rate of 18.6% and 18,219,000 people below the poverty level (51.4%) over a total population of 37,000,000.

Considering the recessionary period started in 1998, unemployment has climbed 74.2%, poverty 67% and indigence 180%; all because of the collapse of a neoliberal system that made the country indebted, leading it to one of the largest crises in its history.

Against this background, the idea of ​​the workers occupying and recovering their jobs is highly satisfactory, since the productive apparatus was destroyed when hundreds of sources of work were dismantled by their own owners.

It is very interesting to see how solidarity areas are being generated and common projects are being built with other sectors (neighborhood assemblies, unemployed people, students, etc.)

We have to take into account that this is not a central process in the economic sense, as companies with greater productive importance are not occupied; But it is central in the sense that it indicates to the workers a possible path to follow when the employers decide to leave them on the street.

Workers are realizing the potential that self-management of companies can have, since it gives them the power to make decisions about what and for what will be produced, safeguard and / or increase employment, democratize the social relations of production, etc.

International Historical Notes on worker self-management:

Historically, workers' self-management in the world has met with both partial successes and failures. In more than a century and a half, workers around the world have shown their strength. There are numerous cases of this type of self-management; one, emblematic, is that of the Lipp watch factory in France in 1973 that shocked Europe.

There were other historical cases in which this type of worker self-management venture worked:

1- In Yugoslavia between 1950 and 1973 there were cases of worker self-management promoted by the Yugoslav socialist regime, but they ended up falling due to the pressures of capitalism and its “market reforms” promoted via the IMF.

2- In Chile, under the Allende government (1970-1973), more than 125 factories were run by workers, but this collapsed due to the coup d'etat promoted by the United States who imposed the dictator Pinochet.

3- In Bolivia in 1952, when there was a popular revolution, the self-management system for workers was promoted (especially in the mining sector). But in 1964 a coup d'état led to the military occupation of the mines and, although there were negotiations, the workers gradually lost power.

4- In 1967 in Peru a group of nationalist officers took power and promoted a regime of cooperatives and industrial communities. This did not prosper due to conflicts with the workers and finally, under neoliberal rules, factories were re-privatized and progressive labor legislation was repealed.

5- The case of Brazil is very important because there are currently more than 200 companies recovered by workers. The first experience was created in 1991 at the Calzados Makerli factory. In 1994 ANTEAG (National Association of Workers in Self-managed Companies) was created with the aim of coordinating the various ventures that were appearing as a result of the industry crisis. It has offices in six states that are in charge of accompanying self-management projects seeking integration with NGOs, state and municipal governments.

For ANTEAG, self-management is an organizational model that combines collective ownership of the means of production with participation and democracy in management. This also implies autonomy in the decisions and control of the companies.

These different examples can be very useful to us and lead us to some considerations:

A- The success of previous factories managed by workers had as pillars horizontal structures based on popular assemblies.

B- The context for the growth of these movements is given under specific conditions.

C- The nationalization of companies without taking workers into account generates corruption, marginalizes them from the spaces of power and the benefits obtained by them may be reduced. And if the bureaucrats in charge generate mismanagement, it may lead to possible bankruptcy and lead to the request for the privatization of these companies.

D- The success of the self-managed worker sector depends on the extension of alliances to other strategic sectors.

E- The workers must take into account that the sectors of economic-financial power will act influencing the state, and if it takes the side of the workers, they will systematically attack it to stop supporting the labor movement.

National Historical Notes on the relationship of workers with the State:

In our country, the link between workers and the State has always been difficult.

The labor movement has always fought for conquests that correspond to its interests, but only at a moment in history was it able to become strong enough to gain power and to achieve its demands.

This fundamental moment was when Perón took charge of the Ministry of Labor and Social Security. From the beginning of his administration (1943-1945) he invited the union leaders to participate in the creation and elaboration of the new social laws; laws that brought about great changes long awaited by the working class. The same working class that will help him succeed in the 1946 elections, after the formation of the Labor Party where the workers achieved a space of power.

At first, the attitude of the workers was expectant regarding the Secretariat that Perón directed. But soon there is a rapprochement due to the first measures promoted by it, which were generating an organized labor movement under new political and union conditions.

Organized worker sectors that supported Perón created the Labor Party to link its action with the general interests of the country and with the norms of a political program.

This program, in which the workers should possess the necessary tools (statutes, laws, etc.) to defend the conquests achieved. Strong and determined attitude led by prominent labor leaders in the face of the possibility that all that was achieved in the event of the return to power of the old electoral parties that never really took care of workers' rights, disappear.

The case of the Labor Party is very important because it was a truly autonomous political organization, with a significant weight at the time and made up entirely of workers.

In this way we will see that a related State could be established with the labor movement but with the will to intervene in its development.

After the fall of the Peronist government in 1955, the workers 'movement gradually lost its social gains, although the struggle was never renounced, as evidenced by the numerous workers' occupations that followed. In the period 1958-1962, with the crisis of the model of capital accumulation by external channels, there was a great wave of claims and takeover of companies.

The level of actions shows the depth and orientation of the political reflections of the time.

In the early 1970s, the cases of the PASA petrochemical company in Rosario and the Mancusso and Rossi litter bin in La Matanza, as well as the occupation and commissioning of the FORD automotive company in Pacheco in 1985, are the immediate antecedents of the process currently in progress.

With this background, we come to the day when workers spend one of the worst moments in their history, paradoxically in the country where there are enough raw materials and everything is to be done.

Current situation:

After that experience and until today, the link between the State and the working mass has been very difficult. However, the workers have continued to have significant achievements; for example:

Certain companies subject to expropriation were declared, this may be total or limited to machinery, equipment, trademarks and patents for a limited time, and given as a loan.

In the area of ​​the Province of Buenos Aires, the state expropriation of several establishments was achieved, as well as the creation by the Governor Felipe Solá of a Productive Fund and the Directorate of the Recovery Plan for Companies in Crisis belonging to the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Production.

In the Legislature of the Province of Buenos Aires several expropriation projects and some projects of general scope are being treated to regulate this problem. One of the most widely accepted by all sectors is the creation of a Trust Fund that would aim to finance the recovery or maintenance of jobs in crisis.

From the workers' side there is still debate on various issues, such as: the form of organization that busy companies must have and the type of management that they must assume.

This has given rise to several conflicting positions, both union and political, such as those that promote the functioning as cooperatives (Impa, Ghelco, Chilavert, La Baskonia, etc.) or those that propose the nationalization of companies under workers control (Brukman, Zanon, Junin Clinic, etc.).

Supporters of forming cooperatives are grouped under the National Movement of Recovered Companies (MNER) and agree to the creation by the State of an initial capital fund to support them.

On the other hand, the companies that propose a pole of Direct Workers' Management (GOD) and the nationalization of these are aligned, mostly with neighborhood assemblies, movements of the unemployed and left-wing parties.

Other points that are being discussed refer to the modality of the possible alliances that would be made with the different political parties, and to what type of level would be covered (local or national).

Until now, the majority opted for the formation of cooperatives, since it seems to be the most rational idea and with the greatest consensus on the part of the State.

Conclusions:

  • It is important that all sectors take into account that, said by the workers themselves, the claims arise and are the result of necessity and not of ideology. If this is not made clear, their legitimacy may be lost. The State must rise to the occasion with the workers and maintain a fluid and effective dialogue with them to listen and solve their needs. If this happens, the positions would be able to reach an agreement, and thus a real willingness to start production and therefore bring the country out of the paralysis in which it is immersed would demonstrate.All this movement represents a significant advance in the path of a social economy,a symbol in the face of the impoverishing neoliberal model and an example that emerges from the hands of the workers showing possible ways to recover their source of work and therefore their dignity. All these sectors must have common objectives to release all their energy and all their creativity. Thus, through appropriate regulations, their ventures will be recognized and this will increase their dynamism, and part of the purchasing power of the state may be redirected to the sector. For this, trust in the different sectors and control of funds will be necessary for the development of a true social economy.their ventures will be recognized and this will increase their dynamism, and part of the purchasing power of the state may be redirected to the sector. For this, trust in the different sectors and control of funds will be necessary for the development of a true social economy.their ventures will be recognized and this will increase their dynamism, and part of the purchasing power of the state may be redirected to the sector. For this, trust in the different sectors and control of funds will be necessary for the development of a true social economy.

May 1, 2003

Bibliography:

  • Dinner, Juan Carlos (2002). "Factory takeover and worker control" in La Maza magazine No. 3, Bs. As.Hazaki, Cesar (2002). "The factory outlet and reality production" in Topia Magazine (electronic edition). Katz, Claudio (2002). “Crisis in Argentina” in Wayruro magazine (electronic edition) www.geocities.com/wayru/geoLucita, Eduardo (2002). "Occupy, resist, produce" magazine Cuadernos del Sur, Argentina Martínez, Josefina (2002). Occupied Factories and direct labor management ”in Class Struggle second epoch N ° 1, Bs. As.Martínez, Oscar y Vocos, Federico (2002). "The companies recovered by the workers and the labor movement" in "Producing Reality. Community Businesses ”Enrique Carpintero and Mario Hernandez (comp.) Editions TOPIA-La MAZA, Bs. As.Ogando, Ariel (2003). "Workers' Self-Management and Cooperativism.Some notes on the case of the factories occupied in Argentina ”(electronic edition) www.rebelion.org Petras, James and Veltmeyer, Henry (2002). "Self-management of workers in a historical perspective" in "Producing Reality. Community Businesses ”Enrique Carpintero and Mario Hernandez (comp.) TOPIA-La MAZA editions, Bs. As.Pichetti, Valentina (2002). "Recovered factories, factories of hopes, the experiences of Zanón and Bruckman in" Producing Reality. Community Businesses ”Enrique Carpintero and Mario Hernandez (comp.) Editions TOPIA-La MAZA, Bs. As.Pont, Susana Elena (1984). "Labor Party: State and Trade Unions" Edition of the Publishing Center of Latin America, Bs. As. Argentina."Self-management of workers in a historical perspective" in "Producing Reality. Community Businesses ”Enrique Carpintero and Mario Hernandez (comp.) TOPIA-La MAZA editions, Bs. As.Pichetti, Valentina (2002). "Recovered factories, factories of hopes, the experiences of Zanón and Bruckman in" Producing Reality. Community Businesses ”Enrique Carpintero and Mario Hernandez (comp.) Editions TOPIA-La MAZA, Bs. As.Pont, Susana Elena (1984). "Labor Party: State and Trade Unions" Edition of the Publishing Center of Latin America, Bs. As. Argentina."Self-management of workers in a historical perspective" in "Producing Reality. Community Businesses ”Enrique Carpintero and Mario Hernandez (comp.) TOPIA-La MAZA editions, Bs. As.Pichetti, Valentina (2002). "Recovered factories, factories of hopes, the experiences of Zanón and Bruckman in" Producing Reality. Community Businesses ”Enrique Carpintero and Mario Hernandez (comp.) Editions TOPIA-La MAZA, Bs. As.Pont, Susana Elena (1984). "Labor Party: State and Trade Unions" Edition of the Publishing Center of Latin America, Bs. As. Argentina.Community Businesses ”Enrique Carpintero and Mario Hernandez (comp.) TOPIA-La MAZA editions, Bs. As.Pont, Susana Elena (1984). "Labor Party: State and Trade Unions" Edition of the Latin American Publishing Center, Bs. As. Argentina.Community Businesses ”Enrique Carpintero and Mario Hernandez (comp.) TOPIA-La MAZA editions, Bs. As.Pont, Susana Elena (1984). "Labor Party: State and Trade Unions" Edition of the Latin American Publishing Center, Bs. As. Argentina.

Annex I:

Some of the main Companies Recovered by workers

BUSINESS LOCATION EMPLOYEES RUBRO
Coop.Diogenes Taborda Bs. As. fifteen YES
Coop. Junin Bs. As. 25 Food
CT Union and Force Hazelnut fifty Foundry
CT The Union Hazelnut twenty Screws
CT Cooptem Hazelnut 28 Tempered glass
CT CIAM Hazelnut 160 Home appliances
Coop. Cooptem Hazelnut twenty Tempered glass
CT RIM Hazelnut 70 Tannery
Coop. Alte. Brown Hazelnut Yes Yes
Coop. VDB Ltda. Hazelnut twenty Combustib transport.
Coop. Cristalux Hazelnut 180 Glass
Sasetru Hazelnut 80 Noodles
Coop. Lavalan Hazelnut twenty Wool wash
Coop. March 8 Adolfo Alsina 40 Paper bin
CT The Factory Ayacucho 14 Wood
CT May 25 Berazategui fifteen Metal casting
Coop. Macber Berazategui fifty Autopartist
CT chemistry of the South Berazategui 28 Paint supplies
Coop. Chrome Berazategui 24 Metallurgical
Maronesse workers Berazategui 3. 4 Autopartist
Coop. Acrow Berazategui 35 Yes
CT Ob. Maximo Paz Cañuelas 60 Poultry fridge
Coop. Metal Varela Florencio Varela Yes Yes
CT germany -ex Parmalat Gral Pinto 56 Dairy products
Coop. From Tr. The slaughter Isidro Casanova 12 Metallurgical
Coop. The Vaskonia Isidro Casanova 120 Food
CT Yaguane The slaughter 480 Fridge
CT Robicop The slaughter 80 Cosmetics
CTU Platense litter bin Silver 32 Paper
Cop. may 17th Silver 12 Service station
CT Villa Elisa Silver 35 Electric motors
Coop. Galaxia Ltda. Florencio Varela Yes Yes
Coop. New era Lanus Yes Yes
Coop. Lanus Metallurgical Lanus Yes Yes
Coop. Phoenix Lanus Yes Yes
Coop. Brown Brown 120 Poultry
Coop. Tra. Fi. Me. Brown Yes Fridge
Coop. Brown Brown 140 Urban transport
Coop. Olavarria bags Olavarria 40 Bags
Coop. Olavarria Olavarria 35 Cement
Coop. CEFA Pillar Yes Gears
Polymec Quilmes 130 Autopartist
CT Velez Sarsfield Quilmes twenty Autopartist
CT Gral. Mosconi Quilmes 40 Metallurgical
Coop. Adavor Quilmes 30 Cons. Metallic
Coop. Metal Varela Quilmes Yes Metallurgical
Coop. Stamina- panif 5 San Fernando 16 Bakery
Coop. Crystal San Justo Four. Five Glass
Coop. San Justo San Justo Yes Yes
Coop. Forge San Martin San Martin Yes Yes
CT Premium Graphics San Martin 30 Printing
Coop. Blaquier F. Ameghino twenty Dairy products
Coop. Saladil mill Saladillo Yes Windmill
Coop. Limited workers Yes Yes Yes
Coop. November 11th San Antonio de Areco Yes Yes
Coop. Saint Charles Sarandi Yes Yes
Coop. The Constituents Villa Martelli 75 Steel
Coop. MVH Villa Martelli fifteen Yes
Coop. Cane Villa Martelli Yes Yes
Coop. Australic Capital Yes Yes
Bruckman Capital 56 Textile
Coop. IMPA Capital 136 Aluminum
Coop. Chilavert Capital 9 Printing
Coop. Vieytes –ex Ghelco Capital Four. Five Food
Coop. Grisinopolis Capital 18 Food
Coop. Graf. Campichuelo Capital YES Graph
CT Las Varillas Cordova 280 Tractors
CT Clinica Junin Cordova 40 Health
CT La Esperanza Cordova 30 Dairy products
CT The newspaper Cordova 36 Journalistic
CT La Prensa Ltda. Cordova 49 Editorial
CT Vizental Between rivers 18 Fridge
CT La Historica The Pampa 30 Screws
CT Textil Pampeana The Pampa 70 Making
CT Ceramica Cuyo Mendoza 40 Ceramics
CT Santa Isabel Santa Fe 80 Avicola refrigerator
Coop. The Canadiens Santa Fe fifty Trailer factory
Coop. Vitrofil Santa Fe fifty Blown glass
Coop. The dairy Santa Fe Four. Five Dairy products
CT Ingenio las Toscas Santa Fe Four. Five sugar
Coop. Railway Santa Fe Yes Railway material
Coop. Indecar Santa Fe Yes Yes
CT DEC Santa Fe 30 Bodyworks
Roque Vasalli workers Santa Fe 60 Farm Equipment
CT The Union Santa Fe 10 Metallurgical
CT Bar Kanter Santa Fe 8 restaurant
CT Pescadores Sur Santa Fe fifteen Fishing
Coop. Avenues Santa Fe 80 Hypermarked
CT Molino San Javier Santa Fe 70 Rice Mill
CT COTRAVI Santa Fe 80 Avicola refrigerator
Coop. La Lechera Santa Fe 10 Dairy products
Coop. United Textile Santa Fe 12 Textile
Zanon Neuquen 280 Ceramic
Coop. JJ Gomez Black river 30 Fridge
La Esperanza sugar mill Jujuy 600 sugar
CT Strudel Santa Fe 17 Bakery

Annex II

Companies recovered by work cooperatives with Expropriation laws Sanctioned in the Province of Buenos Aires:

Law number Promulgation Date Proyect number Cooperative Recovered Company Location Heading Job positions
12565 12/28/00 Coop. De Trabajo Ltda. Unión y Fuerza Hazelnut Non-ferrozo material 60
12688 05/31/01 D-458 / 01-02 Coop. Yaguane (coo.tra.fri.ya.) Yaguane SACIFA refrigerator The slaughter Fridge 480
12712 06/25/01 D-999 / 01-02 Coop. Unión Papelera Platense Ltda. Trash San Jorge SAICyF Silver Paper bin 40
12823 12/27/01 Coop. May 25 Ltda. Hidrodinamica Vasquez SACIFI Quilmes Metallurgical 30
12835 01/02/02 D-2556 / 01-02 Coop. De Trabajo Olavarria Ltda. Peñadura Compañía Minera Industrial SA Olavarria Calera twenty
12862 partial veto 03/12/02 Mecber Coop. De Trabajo Ltda. GESMA SRL Berazategui Auto parts metallurgy fifty
12894 06/05/02 E-69 / 02-03 Mecber Coop. De Trabajo Ltda. (Installa. / Machine.) GESMA SRL Berazategui Auto parts metallurgy "
12893 06/05/02 E-202 / 01-02 Coop. Working cooptem Ltda. TEMPLARI SA Hazelnut Tempered Glass twenty
12903 06/26/02 Coop. The Stamina Bakery Five Baking five sa Vicente Lopez Bakery fifteen
12904 06/27/02 E-103 / 02-03 Coop. Baskonia Ltda. Company La Baskonia SAFIC SA The slaughter Metallurgical 70
12921 08/09/02 E-232 / 01-02 Coop. Blaquier Ltda. Company Lactea Tres SRL F. Ameghino Dairy products twenty
12923 08/09/02 D-1068 / 02-03 Coop. Lavalán Ltda. Emp. The SACIFI Triumph Hazelnut Wool laundry 27
12924 08/14/02 D-739 / 02-03 Coop. Quimica del Sur Ltda. SACIFI South American Chemistry Berazategui Chemistry 40
12937 09/03/02 D-1256 / 02-03 Coop. Olavarría Ltda bags. Bolsas Olavarría SA Olavarria Bag Factory 40
12938 09/03/02 D1330 / 02-03 Coop. Hazelnut Crystal Cristalux SA DURAX Hazelnut Glass 120
12954 10/04/02 E-223 / 02-03 Coop. San Justo San Justo glassware The slaughter Glassware 25
12957 10/22/02 Coop. Limited Saladillo Mill SICSA mills Saladillo Windmill
12997 12/20/02 E-246 / 02-03 Coop. MVH Ltda. Metalúrgica Vicente Hnos Villa Marteli Metallurgical 18
12998 12/20/02 E-290 / 02-03 Coop. San Carlos Ltda. Sarandi
12996 12/20/02 E-126 / 02-03 Coop. The Constituents Ltda. Vicente Lopez Metallurgical 80
Total veto Dec. 3123 12/21/02 E-269 / 02-03 Coop. Limited Workers Victorio Bernardi SA
13,034 03/27/03 D-895 / 02-03 Coop. Crometal Ltda. Acrometalica SA Berazategui Metallurgical 24
13,027 03/12/03 E-250 / 02-03 Coop. Tra.Fi.Mi. Minguillon refrigerator Brown Fridge
13,035 03/27/03 E-323 / 02-03 Coop. Fenix ​​Limited Lanus
13,037 (mod. 12,904) 03/27/03 E-303 / 02-03 Coop. LaBaskonia Ltda.
13,039 mod. Law 12,996) 03/27/03 E-364 / 02-03 Coop. The Constituents

Annex III

Projects pending in the Legislature of the Province of Buenos Aires:

File Number Cooperative Legislative State Recovered Company Heading Job positions Location
D-1338/02/03 Coop. may 17th Deputies Coop. De Taximetristas 25 de mayo Ltda. Service station 12 Silver
D-1583 / 02-03 Roby Coop. Ltda Deputies Knox Republic SA Cosmetics 35 The slaughter
E-179 / 02-03 Coop. VDB Ltda. Senate Victorio de Bernardi SA Fuel Transportation twenty Hazelnut
E-111 / 02-03 Coop. March 8 Senate Celulosa Carhue SA Paper bin 40 Adolfo Alsina
E-134 / 02-03 Coop. CEFA Senate Coop. Fab gears. Arg. Gears Pillar
D-1760 / 02-03 Coop. Working La Unión Ltda. Deputies Bolt Factory 30 Hazelnut
E-245 / 02-03 Coop. From Tr. The slaughter Deputies Metallurgical / Screws 12 Isidro Casanova
E-249 / 02-03 Coop. Lavalan Deputies Hazelnut
D-774 / 02-03 Coop. The Baskonia Senate Laferrere
D-2362 / 02-03 Coop. Metal Varela Deputies Florencio Varela
D-2363 / 02-03 Coop. Limited Galaxy Executive 03/24/03 Florencio Varela
E-329 / 02-03 Coop. New era Executive 03/19/03 Lanus
D-2524 / 02-03 Coop. Metallurgists Lanus Ld Deputies Lanus
E-356 / 02-03 Coop. Forja San Martin Ltda. Deputies Gral. San Martin
D-2645 / 02-03 (mod. Art. 2 law 12565) Coop. Union and Strength Deputies Hazelnut
E-269 / 02-03 Total Veto Dec. 3123 Coop. Limited Workers Deputies
D-2691 / 02-03 Coop. Mariano Moreno Ltda. Deputies
D-2694 / 02-03 Coop. Alte. Brown Ltda. Deputies Hazelnut
D-2743 / 02-03 Coop. November 11 Ltda. Executive 03/24/03 San Antonio de Areco

Annex IV

Projects on Converted Companies in the Province of Buenos Aires:

Draft Author Cover State Date Block
E-263 / 02-03 Patricia Jorge Creation of Economic Units for self-employment and subsistence work activities (WINGS) Labor and legislation-SENATE 09/18/02 PJ
E-325 / 02-03 Trucco, Díaz, Salemme Trust Fund for Business Recovery Senate 11/14/02 PJ
D-2396 / 02-03 Graciela Vanzán Project to ensure the continuity of converted companies Deputies 11/6/02 FREPASO
E-244 / 02-03 Horacio Roman Modifying the Expropriation Law. Establishing with just two years the period to consider an expropriation abandoned Senate 09/03/02 PJ
D-2100 / 02-03 Alfonsin Creating the Permanent Fund for Productive recovery. Deputies 10/2/02 UCR
D-1798 / 02-03 Jose Roman Suspension for three years of execution and debts to cooperatives. Deputies 08/29/02 FREPASO
D-302 / 02-03 Suarez Requesting to fully comply with article 41 in terms of promoting the organization of cooperatives, giving it a tax treatment according to its nature. Executive Statement 03/19/02 FREPASO

Annex V

Projects on the subject in the National Congress

Author Draft
Deputy Barba Gutiérrez. Recovery of bankrupt companies. Bankruptcy Law Modification.
Deputy Mario Cafiero Reconversion of Companies in Work Cooperatives.
Deputy Melillo Expropriation Project.
Companies recovered by workers in Argentina